Although this article refers to the impact of study abroad programs at the community college level, the implications are just as meaningful for four-year universities. This reminds us that global experience and learning is extremely important for all students, freshman through seniors. The Liberal Education Program seeks to inform students on this global level. Is there something you can do to provide more of this global learning and/or even provide a study abroad experience in your classes? Read the article here.
Today’s Inside Higher Education features an article on the results of a pilot MIT study from 2013 where students spend much less time in the classroom. Freshman year courses were all online and senior year was eliminated in favor of a series of continuing education courses.
The result is a report with some significant recommendations that are important for institutions revising their pedagogical methods and offerings. The four primary recommendations from the project are:
- Increase Interdisciplinary Collaboration Across Fields of Research in Higher Education, Using an Integrated Research Agenda
- Promote Online as an Important Facilitator in Higher Education
- Support the Expanding Profession of the “Learning Engineer”
- Foster Institutional and Organizational Change in Higher Education to Implement These Reforms
Perhaps the most important paragraph is:
But the report is as much about the shortcomings of online education as it is about its potential. Most importantly, it recommends online education play a supporting role as a “dynamic digital scaffold.” Online education can offer personalized pathways through course content with short lecture videos and well-timed quizzes that help students retain knowledge, the report reads, but it is most effective in a blended setting where students regularly interact with faculty members face-to-face.
What place does blended learning have in a Liberal Education curriculum? How can faculty better integrate innovative tools while still maintaining traditional strengths of university pedagogy?
A College of Charleston professor has been stripped of his teaching duties after a clash with administration over his learning outcomes, or rather, his lack thereof.
What is your opinion of Mr. Dillon’s use of Woodrow Wilson’s quote as his learning outcomes? Are they suitable for the purpose? Or should learning outcomes be more specific?
The object of education is not merely to draw out the powers of the individual mind: It is rather its right object to draw all minds to a proper adjustment to the physical and social world in which they are to have their life and their development: to enlighten, strengthen, and make fit. The business of the world is not individual success, but its own betterment, strengthening, and growth in spiritual insight. “So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom” is its right prayer and aspiration.
Read more at: http://chronicle.com/article/Silly-Sanctimonious/235861
Should these books be mandatory reading for our students, and maybe for us, as faculty, also? A reminder of the importance of a liberal arts education could perhaps benefit us and refresh us in our teaching of those courses!
The process of revamping the Liberal Education program at FHSU is an experience that takes time and dedicated people. Maybe you haven’t had the time you’d like to keep up with this process or to even understand what the process entails. It is always important to keep the underlying goal in mind when moving forward so check out this piece from AAC&U (1998) outlining the statement of Liberal Learning.
The 21st century learning skills are often called the 4 C’s: critical thinking, creative thinking, communicating, and collaborating. These skills help students learn, and so they are vital to success in school and beyond. This is a great connection to the Lib Ed Learning Outcomes.
Read more here: https://k12.thoughtfullearning.com/FAQ/what-are-learning-skills